David McClanahan - Quanta Services Independent Chairman of the Board
| PWR Stock | USD 341.92 1.91 0.56% |
Chairman
Mr. David M. McClanahan is Chairman of the Board of the Quanta Services Inc. since May 2017. He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. from October 2002 until December 2013 and as Special Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. from January 2014 until July 2014. From 1999 until 2002, Mr. McClanahan served as President and Chief Operating Officer of all regulated operations for Reliant Energy, Inc. He also previously served as a director of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. from 2002 until 2013 since 2018.
| Age | 70 |
| Tenure | 6 years |
| Professional Marks | MBA |
| Address | 2727 North Loop West, Houston, TX, United States, 77008 |
| Phone | 713 629 7600 |
| Web | https://www.quantaservices.com |
Quanta Services Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0433 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0433 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.127 %, implying that it generated $0.127 on every 100 dollars invested. Quanta Services' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Quanta Services manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Quanta Services' Return On Tangible Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/25/2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.05, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.09. At this time, Quanta Services' Intangibles To Total Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/25/2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.05, while Net Tangible Assets are likely to drop slightly above 289.1 M.Similar Executives
| Found 13 records | CHAIRMAN Age | ||
| Lester Lyles | KBR Inc | 74 | |
| Steven Nielsen | Dycom Industries | 61 | |
| Michael McNally | Granite Construction Incorporat | 65 | |
| Franklin Myers | Comfort Systems USA | 67 | |
| Alec Covington | Topbuild Corp | 64 | |
| Daniel Tishman | Aecom Technology | 65 | |
| Douglas Stotlar | Aecom Technology | 60 | |
| Jorge Mas | MasTec Inc | 57 | |
| Michael Burke | Aecom Technology | 55 | |
| Alan Boeckmann | Fluor | 72 | |
| Claes Bjork | Granite Construction Incorporat | 74 | |
| Dan Batrack | Tetra Tech | 66 | |
| Anthony Guzzi | EMCOR Group | 60 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.13 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0433 |
Quanta Services Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Quanta Services' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Quanta Services inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Quanta. The board's role is to monitor Quanta Services' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Quanta Services' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Quanta Services' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Bernard Fried, Independent Director | ||
| Holli Ladhani, Director | ||
| Worthing Jackman, Independent Director | ||
| Derrick Jensen, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer | ||
| Kip CFA, Vice Relations | ||
| Earl Austin, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Director | ||
| Sean Eastman, Director Relations | ||
| Carolyn Campbell, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Jerry Lemon, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| Paul Gregory, Chief Strategy Officer, President – Underground Utility and Infrastructure Division | ||
| Gerald Ducey, President Operations | ||
| John Conaway, Independent Director | ||
| Paul Nobel, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| Patrick Wood, Independent Director | ||
| Redgie Probst, Chief Operating Officer, President – Electric Power Division | ||
| James Probst, Chief Officer | ||
| Nicholas Grindstaff, Vice President - Finance, Treasurer | ||
| Karl Studer, President Power | ||
| Doyle Beneby, Independent Director | ||
| Donald JD, Executive Counsel | ||
| Vincent Foster, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Donald Wayne, Executive Vice President General Counsel | ||
| Martha Wyrsch, Independent Director | ||
| Jayshree Desai, Chief Corporate Development Officer | ||
| Derrick CPA, Executive Administration | ||
| Kimberly Riddle, Vice Resources | ||
| Scot Fluharty, President Industrial | ||
| CHST CUSP, Health Safety | ||
| Dorothy Upperman, Vice President - Tax | ||
| David McClanahan, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Margaret Shannon, Independent Director | ||
| Kip Rupp, Vice President IR Contact Officer |
Quanta Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Quanta Services a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.13 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0433 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.04 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.06 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 54.71 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 147.61 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.00 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 94.30 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.84 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 48.67 X |
Pair Trading with Quanta Services
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Quanta Services position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Quanta Services will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Quanta Stock
| 0.86 | J | Jacobs Solutions | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | ESOA | Energy Services Fiscal Year End 16th of December 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Quanta Services could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Quanta Services when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Quanta Services - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Quanta Services to buy it.
The correlation of Quanta Services is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Quanta Services moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Quanta Services moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Quanta Services can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Quanta Stock Analysis
When running Quanta Services' price analysis, check to measure Quanta Services' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Quanta Services is operating at the current time. Most of Quanta Services' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Quanta Services' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Quanta Services' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Quanta Services to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.