Daniel Schwartz - Restaurant Brands Executive Chairman of the Board, Co-Chairman

QSR Stock  CAD 97.59  0.91  0.94%   

Chairman

Mr. Daniel S. Schwartz is Executive Chairman of the Board, CoChairman of the Company. Mr. Schwartz has served on our Board since December 2014. Mr. Schwartz, the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company from December 2014 until January 22, 2019, was appointed Executive Chairman of the Company effective January 23, 2019 and will serve in that capacity for a transition period ending September 30, 2019. From June 2013 until December 2014, Mr. Schwartz served as CEO, from April 2013 until June 2013, he served as Chief Operating Officer and from January 2011 until April 2013, he served as Chief Financial Officer of BKW and its predecessor. Mr. Schwartz joined Burger King Holdings, Inc. in October 2010 as Executive Vice President, Deputy Chief Financial Officer. Since January 2008, Mr. Schwartz was a partner with 3G Capital, where he was responsible for managing 3G Capitals private equity business until October 2010. From 2012 until February 2015, Mr. Schwartz served as a director of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc., RBIs largest Burger King franchisee in the United States. Mr. Schwartz is a director of 3G Capital. since 2019.
Age 38
Tenure 5 years
Address 130 King Street West, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5X 1E1
Phone905 339 6011
Webhttps://www.rbi.com

Restaurant Brands Management Efficiency

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0586 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0586 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3731 %, meaning that it generated $0.3731 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Restaurant Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Restaurant Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 26th of November 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.10. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.07. As of the 26th of November 2024, Non Currrent Assets Other is likely to grow to about 1.3 B, while Total Assets are likely to drop about 20.7 B.
Restaurant Brands International has accumulated 14.52 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 3.52, implying the company greatly relies on financing operations through barrowing. Restaurant Brands has a current ratio of 1.62, which is within standard range for the sector. Debt can assist Restaurant Brands until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Restaurant Brands' shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Restaurant Brands sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Restaurant to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Restaurant Brands' use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Similar Executives

Found 4 records

CHAIRMAN Age

Stephen GunnDollarama
64
Mayo SchmidtNutrien
60
Larry RossyDollarama
72
William YoungMagna International
64
Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates, and franchises quick service restaurants under the Tim Hortons , Burger King , and Popeyes brand names. Restaurant Brands International Inc. was founded in 1954 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada. RESTAURANT BRANDS operates under Restaurants classification in Canada and is traded on Toronto Stock Exchange. It employs 6300 people. Restaurant Brands International (QSR) is traded on Toronto Exchange in Canada and employs 9,000 people. Restaurant Brands is listed under Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure category by Fama And French industry classification.

Management Performance

Restaurant Brands Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Restaurant Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Restaurant Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Restaurant. The board's role is to monitor Restaurant Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Restaurant Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Restaurant Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Alexandre Behring, Executive Chairman, Chairman of Compensation Committee and Chairman of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Matthew Dunnigan, Chief Financial Officer
Axel Schwan, President - Tim Hortons Americas
Daniel Schwartz, Executive Chairman of the Board, Co-Chairman
Joshua Kobza, Chief Operating Officer
Thomas Curtis, President Canada
Sami Siddiqui, President Canada
Jacqueline Friesner, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller
Christopher Finazzo, President - Burger King Americas
Fernando Machado, Chief Marketing Officer
Jeff Housman, Chief Officer
Golnar Khosrowshahi, Independent Director
Roberto Motta, Independent Director
Patrick Doyle, Executive Chairman
Carlos Sicupira, Independent Director
Jill Granat, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary
David Shear, President International
Duncan Fulton, Chief Corporate Officer
Felipe Athayde, President - Popeyes Americas
Jason Melbourne, Independent Director
Paul Fribourg, Independent Director
Stephen Lichtner, Director Relations
Neil Golden, Independent Director
Jose Cil, Chief Executive Officer
Kendall Peck, Head Relations
Ali Hedayat, Independent Director
Chris Brigleb, Head IR
Joao CastroNeves, Independent Director

Restaurant Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Restaurant Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving together with Restaurant Stock

  0.81CEF Sprott Physical GoldPairCorr
  0.66PVF-UN Partners Value InvesPairCorr

Moving against Restaurant Stock

  0.48SLF-PG Sun Life NonPairCorr
  0.31MFC-PC Manulife Finl SrsPairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching
When determining whether Restaurant Brands is a strong investment it is important to analyze Restaurant Brands' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Restaurant Brands' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Restaurant Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Restaurant Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Restaurant Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Restaurant Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.