Krishna Shivram - Ranger Energy Independent Director
| RNGR Stock | USD 16.50 0.33 1.96% |
Director
Mr. Krishna Shivram is Independent Director of the Company. Mr. Shivram currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Sentinel Energy Services Inc., positions he has held since June 2017. Mr. Shivram served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Weatherford International plc from November 2013 to November 2016, and as interim Chief Executive Officer of Weatherford International plc from November 2016 to March 2017, subsequent to which he evaluated potential opportunities prior to joining us. Immediately prior to joining Weatherford, Mr. Shivram served as Vice President and Treasurer of Schlumberger Ltd. since January 2011. Prior to his serving as Vice President and Treasurer, Mr. Shivram held a number of senior management positions at Schlumberger, including ControllerDrilling Group from May 2010 to January 2011, ManagerMergers and Acquisitions from May 2009 to April 2010 and ControllerOilfield Services from August 2006 to April 2009 since 2017.
| Age | 57 |
| Tenure | 7 years |
| Address | 10350 Richmond, Houston, TX, United States, 77042 |
| Phone | 713 935 8900 |
| Web | https://www.rangerenergy.com |
Ranger Energy Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0399 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0399 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.0536 %, meaning that it created $0.0536 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Ranger Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Ranger Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/26/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.07. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.13. At this time, Ranger Energy's Return On Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/26/2024, Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 1.77, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 223.1 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Lisa Troe | Expro Group Holdings | 59 | |
| John Perkins | MRC Global | 72 | |
| Robert Wood | MRC Global | 67 | |
| Pamela Rollins | RPC Inc | 63 | |
| Eitan Arbeter | Expro Group Holdings | 40 | |
| Alan Schrager | Expro Group Holdings | 52 | |
| Jerry Nix | RPC Inc | 75 | |
| Mark Berg | ProPetro Holding Corp | 62 | |
| Jack Moore | ProPetro Holding Corp | 67 | |
| Brian Truelove | Expro Group Holdings | 62 | |
| Cornelis Linse | MRC Global | 71 | |
| Harry Cynkus | RPC Inc | 70 | |
| Barbara Duganier | MRC Global | 62 | |
| Anthony Best | ProPetro Holding Corp | 71 | |
| Deborah Adams | MRC Global | 60 | |
| James Williams | RPC Inc | 85 | |
| Amy Kreisler | RPC Inc | 51 | |
| Alan Douglas | ProPetro Holding Corp | 62 | |
| Henry Tippie | RPC Inc | 92 | |
| Patrick Gunning | RPC Inc | 61 | |
| Robert Drummond | Expro Group Holdings | 60 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0536 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0399 |
Ranger Energy Services Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Ranger Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Ranger Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Ranger. The board's role is to monitor Ranger Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Ranger Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Ranger Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Matt Hooker, VP Services | ||
| J Blossman, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Stuart Bodden, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Gerald Cimador, Independent Director | ||
| Merrill Miller, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Shelley Weimer, VP Compliance | ||
| Richard Agee, Independent Director | ||
| James Yaw, Vice Resources | ||
| Melissa CPA, Chief Officer | ||
| Brett Agee, Independent Director | ||
| Justin Whitley, General Secretary | ||
| Chief Tauzin, Vice Sales | ||
| Krishna Shivram, Independent Director | ||
| Matthew Hooker, Senior Services | ||
| Darron Anderson, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| William Austin, Chairman of the Board, Interim Chief Executive Officer | ||
| Mario Hernandez, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| Melissa Cougle, Chief Officer | ||
| Byron Dunn, Independent Director | ||
| Matt McCoy, VP Services | ||
| Charles Leykum, Independent Director | ||
| Casey Nipper, Senior Services | ||
| Michael Kearney, Independent Director | ||
| Joe Mease, Vice Finance | ||
| Lance Perryman, Executive Vice President - Processing Solutions | ||
| Mark Haubert, Marketing Devel |
Ranger Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Ranger Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0536 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0399 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.03 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.08 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 381.09 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 22.25 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 16.05 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 70.15 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 305.72 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 6.89 X |
Pair Trading with Ranger Energy
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Ranger Energy position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ranger Energy will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Ranger Stock
Moving against Ranger Stock
| 0.69 | TDW | Tidewater | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | XPRO | Expro Group Holdings | PairCorr |
| 0.46 | DTI | Drilling Tools Inter | PairCorr |
| 0.31 | WFRD | Weatherford International | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Ranger Energy could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Ranger Energy when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Ranger Energy - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Ranger Energy Services to buy it.
The correlation of Ranger Energy is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Ranger Energy moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Ranger Energy Services moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Ranger Energy can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Ranger Stock Analysis
When running Ranger Energy's price analysis, check to measure Ranger Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Ranger Energy is operating at the current time. Most of Ranger Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Ranger Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Ranger Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Ranger Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.