Jennifer Koester - Sphere Entertainment President COO
| SPHR Stock | 41.04 1.03 2.45% |
President
Jennifer Koester is President COO of Sphere Entertainment Co
| Address | Two Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY, United States, 10121 |
| Phone | 725-258-0001 |
| Web | https://www.sphereentertainmentco.com |
Sphere Entertainment Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0248) % which means that it has lost $0.0248 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (0.1604) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Sphere Entertainment's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Sphere Entertainment manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/22/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to -0.04. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to -0.09. At this time, Sphere Entertainment's Non Currrent Assets Other are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/22/2024, Total Current Assets is likely to grow to about 1 B, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 3.2 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | PRESIDENT Age | ||
| Manish Bhatia | Micron Technology | 52 | |
| Walter Vahey | Teradyne | 59 | |
| Kim Povlsen | Teradyne | N/A | |
| John Simmons | Bridgford Foods | 68 | |
| Michael Bokan | Micron Technology | 62 | |
| Bradford BSEE | Teradyne | 65 | |
| Brian Lorig | KLA Tencor | 50 | |
| Ryan Driscoll | Teradyne | N/A | |
| Bradford Robbins | Teradyne | 65 | |
| John BSEE | Teradyne | N/A | |
| Donghyun Hwang | MACOM Technology Solutions | 60 | |
| Walter Baker | MACOM Technology Solutions | 57 | |
| Baron Bridgford | Bridgford Foods | N/A | |
| Richard Burns | Teradyne | 60 | |
| Susan Rice | Entegris | 65 | |
| John Wood | Teradyne | N/A | |
| Scott DeBoer | Micron Technology | 58 | |
| JeanPierre Hathout | Teradyne | N/A | |
| Sanjay Mehta | Teradyne | 55 | |
| Daniel Yost | Bridgford Foods | N/A | |
| Douglas Carlson | MACOM Technology Solutions | 62 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.16 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0248 |
Sphere Entertainment Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Sphere Entertainment's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Sphere Entertainment inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Sphere. The board's role is to monitor Sphere Entertainment's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Sphere Entertainment's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Sphere Entertainment's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Ray Casazza, Executive Administration | ||
| Ari CFA, Financial Relations | ||
| Mikyl Cordova, Executive Marketing | ||
| Richard Constable, Executive Impact | ||
| David GranvilleSmith, Executive President | ||
| James Claffey, Executive Management | ||
| James Dolan, Executive CEO | ||
| David Byrnes, CFO VP | ||
| Joel Fisher, Executive Operations | ||
| Gregory Brunner, Controller VP | ||
| Andrea Greenberg, President Networks | ||
| Laura Franco, Executive Counsel | ||
| Jennifer Koester, President COO |
Sphere Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Sphere Entertainment a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.16 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0248 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.33) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.45) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 2.46 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 28.93 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 6.20 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 93.80 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 7.48 M | ||||
| Price To Book | 0.65 X |
Pair Trading with Sphere Entertainment
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Sphere Entertainment position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sphere Entertainment will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Sphere Stock
Moving against Sphere Stock
| 0.62 | T | ATT Inc Aggressive Push | PairCorr |
| 0.55 | TZOO | Travelzoo | PairCorr |
| 0.43 | QNST | QuinStreet | PairCorr |
| 0.43 | Z | Zillow Group Class | PairCorr |
| 0.4 | KT | KT Corporation | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Sphere Entertainment could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Sphere Entertainment when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Sphere Entertainment - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Sphere Entertainment Co to buy it.
The correlation of Sphere Entertainment is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Sphere Entertainment moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Sphere Entertainment moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Sphere Entertainment can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Sphere Stock Analysis
When running Sphere Entertainment's price analysis, check to measure Sphere Entertainment's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Sphere Entertainment is operating at the current time. Most of Sphere Entertainment's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Sphere Entertainment's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Sphere Entertainment's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Sphere Entertainment to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.