Correlation Between Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of Suzhou with a short position of Cicc Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund

0.21
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Cicc is 0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cicc Fund Management and Bank of Suzhou is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of Suzhou are associated (or correlated) with Cicc Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cicc Fund Management has no effect on the direction of Bank of Suzhou i.e., Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of Suzhou is expected to generate 6.01 times less return on investment than Cicc Fund. In addition to that, Bank of Suzhou is 1.33 times more volatile than Cicc Fund Management. It trades about 0.07 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Cicc Fund Management is currently generating about 0.53 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  225.00  in Cicc Fund Management on October 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  23.00  from holding Cicc Fund Management or generate 10.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of Suzhou  vs.  Cicc Fund Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of Suzhou 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Over the last 90 days Bank of Suzhou has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Bank of Suzhou is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Cicc Fund Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cicc Fund Management are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Cicc Fund may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of Suzhou position performs unexpectedly, Cicc Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cicc Fund will offset losses from the drop in Cicc Fund's long position.
The idea behind Bank of Suzhou and Cicc Fund Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas