Correlation Between Federal Realty and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Federal Realty and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Federal Realty and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Federal Realty Investment and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Federal Realty and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Federal Realty with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Federal Realty and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Federal Realty and Litigation Capital

-0.08
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Federal and Litigation is -0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Federal Realty Investment and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Federal Realty is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Federal Realty Investment are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Federal Realty i.e., Federal Realty and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Federal Realty and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Federal Realty Investment is expected to generate 1.01 times more return on investment than Litigation Capital. However, Federal Realty is 1.01 times more volatile than Litigation Capital Management. It trades about 0.37 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,118  in Federal Realty Investment on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  635.00  from holding Federal Realty Investment or generate 5.71% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Federal Realty Investment  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Federal Realty Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Federal Realty Investment are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Federal Realty is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Federal Realty and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Federal Realty and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Federal Realty and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Federal Realty position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Federal Realty Investment and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals