Correlation Between Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Monster Beverage Corp and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Monster Beverage with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital

0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Monster and Litigation is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Monster Beverage Corp and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Monster Beverage is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Monster Beverage Corp are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Monster Beverage i.e., Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Monster Beverage is expected to generate 2.35 times less return on investment than Litigation Capital. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Monster Beverage Corp is 1.29 times less risky than Litigation Capital. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9,727  in Litigation Capital Management on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,848  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 19.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy98.99%
ValuesDaily Returns

Monster Beverage Corp  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Monster Beverage Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Monster Beverage Corp are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Monster Beverage unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Monster Beverage and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Monster Beverage position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Monster Beverage Corp and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges