Correlation Between Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Nanjing Putian Telecommunications and Shenzhen Centralcon Investment, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Nanjing Putian with a short position of Shenzhen Centralcon. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon.

Diversification Opportunities for Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon

0.88
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Nanjing and Shenzhen is 0.88. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Nanjing Putian Telecommunicati and Shenzhen Centralcon Investment in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Shenzhen Centralcon and Nanjing Putian is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Nanjing Putian Telecommunications are associated (or correlated) with Shenzhen Centralcon. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Shenzhen Centralcon has no effect on the direction of Nanjing Putian i.e., Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Nanjing Putian Telecommunications is expected to generate 1.92 times more return on investment than Shenzhen Centralcon. However, Nanjing Putian is 1.92 times more volatile than Shenzhen Centralcon Investment. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Shenzhen Centralcon Investment is currently generating about 0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  388.00  in Nanjing Putian Telecommunications on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  49.00  from holding Nanjing Putian Telecommunications or generate 12.63% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Nanjing Putian Telecommunicati  vs.  Shenzhen Centralcon Investment

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Nanjing Putian Telec 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

27 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Nanjing Putian Telecommunications are ranked lower than 27 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Nanjing Putian sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Shenzhen Centralcon 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Shenzhen Centralcon Investment are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Shenzhen Centralcon sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon

The main advantage of trading using opposite Nanjing Putian and Shenzhen Centralcon positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Nanjing Putian position performs unexpectedly, Shenzhen Centralcon can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Shenzhen Centralcon will offset losses from the drop in Shenzhen Centralcon's long position.
The idea behind Nanjing Putian Telecommunications and Shenzhen Centralcon Investment pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.