Correlation Between Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Chongqing Sulian Plastic and Heilongjiang Publishing Media, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Chongqing Sulian with a short position of Heilongjiang Publishing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing.

Diversification Opportunities for Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing

0.72
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Chongqing and Heilongjiang is 0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Chongqing Sulian Plastic and Heilongjiang Publishing Media in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Heilongjiang Publishing and Chongqing Sulian is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Chongqing Sulian Plastic are associated (or correlated) with Heilongjiang Publishing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Heilongjiang Publishing has no effect on the direction of Chongqing Sulian i.e., Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Chongqing Sulian Plastic is expected to generate 0.91 times more return on investment than Heilongjiang Publishing. However, Chongqing Sulian Plastic is 1.1 times less risky than Heilongjiang Publishing. It trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Heilongjiang Publishing Media is currently generating about -0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,783  in Chongqing Sulian Plastic on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (104.00) from holding Chongqing Sulian Plastic or give up 3.74% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Chongqing Sulian Plastic  vs.  Heilongjiang Publishing Media

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Chongqing Sulian Plastic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Chongqing Sulian Plastic are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Chongqing Sulian may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Heilongjiang Publishing 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Heilongjiang Publishing Media has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Heilongjiang Publishing is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing

The main advantage of trading using opposite Chongqing Sulian and Heilongjiang Publishing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Chongqing Sulian position performs unexpectedly, Heilongjiang Publishing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Heilongjiang Publishing will offset losses from the drop in Heilongjiang Publishing's long position.
The idea behind Chongqing Sulian Plastic and Heilongjiang Publishing Media pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences