Correlation Between China Railway and Bank of America

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Railway and Bank of America at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Railway and Bank of America into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Railway Construction and Verizon Communications, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Railway and Bank of America and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Railway with a short position of Bank of America. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Railway and Bank of America.

Diversification Opportunities for China Railway and Bank of America

0.27
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Bank is 0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Railway Construction and Verizon Communications in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Verizon Communications and China Railway is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Railway Construction are associated (or correlated) with Bank of America. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Verizon Communications has no effect on the direction of China Railway i.e., China Railway and Bank of America go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Railway and Bank of America

Assuming the 90 days horizon China Railway Construction is expected to under-perform the Bank of America. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, China Railway Construction is 1.3 times less risky than Bank of America. The stock trades about -0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Verizon Communications is currently generating about 0.33 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,842  in Verizon Communications on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  381.00  from holding Verizon Communications or generate 9.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy91.3%
ValuesDaily Returns

China Railway Construction  vs.  Verizon Communications

 Performance 
       Timeline  
China Railway Constr 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Railway Construction are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, China Railway reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Verizon Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Verizon Communications are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain fundamental indicators, Bank of America unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

China Railway and Bank of America Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with China Railway and Bank of America

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Railway and Bank of America positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Railway position performs unexpectedly, Bank of America can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of America will offset losses from the drop in Bank of America's long position.
The idea behind China Railway Construction and Verizon Communications pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance