Correlation Between China Petroleum and Postal Savings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Petroleum and Postal Savings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Petroleum and Postal Savings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Petroleum Chemical and Postal Savings Bank, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Petroleum and Postal Savings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Petroleum with a short position of Postal Savings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Petroleum and Postal Savings.

Diversification Opportunities for China Petroleum and Postal Savings

0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Postal is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Petroleum Chemical and Postal Savings Bank in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Postal Savings Bank and China Petroleum is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Petroleum Chemical are associated (or correlated) with Postal Savings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Postal Savings Bank has no effect on the direction of China Petroleum i.e., China Petroleum and Postal Savings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Petroleum and Postal Savings

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon China Petroleum Chemical is expected to under-perform the Postal Savings. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, China Petroleum Chemical is 1.26 times less risky than Postal Savings. The stock trades about -0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Postal Savings Bank is currently generating about -0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  543.00  in Postal Savings Bank on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (17.00) from holding Postal Savings Bank or give up 3.13% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

China Petroleum Chemical  vs.  Postal Savings Bank

 Performance 
       Timeline  
China Petroleum Chemical 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days China Petroleum Chemical has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, China Petroleum is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Postal Savings Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Postal Savings Bank has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Postal Savings is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

China Petroleum and Postal Savings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with China Petroleum and Postal Savings

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Petroleum and Postal Savings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Petroleum position performs unexpectedly, Postal Savings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Postal Savings will offset losses from the drop in Postal Savings' long position.
The idea behind China Petroleum Chemical and Postal Savings Bank pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency