Correlation Between Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Inspur Software Co and Guangzhou KingTeller Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Inspur Software with a short position of Guangzhou KingTeller. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller.

Diversification Opportunities for Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller

0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Inspur and Guangzhou is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Inspur Software Co and Guangzhou KingTeller Technolog in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guangzhou KingTeller and Inspur Software is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Inspur Software Co are associated (or correlated) with Guangzhou KingTeller. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guangzhou KingTeller has no effect on the direction of Inspur Software i.e., Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Inspur Software Co is expected to generate 0.52 times more return on investment than Guangzhou KingTeller. However, Inspur Software Co is 1.92 times less risky than Guangzhou KingTeller. It trades about -0.34 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guangzhou KingTeller Technology is currently generating about -0.29 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,617  in Inspur Software Co on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (277.00) from holding Inspur Software Co or give up 17.13% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Inspur Software Co  vs.  Guangzhou KingTeller Technolog

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Inspur Software 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Inspur Software Co are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Inspur Software is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Guangzhou KingTeller 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guangzhou KingTeller Technology are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Guangzhou KingTeller sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller

The main advantage of trading using opposite Inspur Software and Guangzhou KingTeller positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Inspur Software position performs unexpectedly, Guangzhou KingTeller can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guangzhou KingTeller will offset losses from the drop in Guangzhou KingTeller's long position.
The idea behind Inspur Software Co and Guangzhou KingTeller Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance