Correlation Between Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Agricultural Bank of and Changjiang Publishing Media, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Agricultural Bank with a short position of Changjiang Publishing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing.

Diversification Opportunities for Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing

-0.05
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Agricultural and Changjiang is -0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Agricultural Bank of and Changjiang Publishing Media in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Changjiang Publishing and Agricultural Bank is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Agricultural Bank of are associated (or correlated) with Changjiang Publishing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Changjiang Publishing has no effect on the direction of Agricultural Bank i.e., Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Agricultural Bank of is expected to under-perform the Changjiang Publishing. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Agricultural Bank of is 1.91 times less risky than Changjiang Publishing. The stock trades about -0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Changjiang Publishing Media is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  864.00  in Changjiang Publishing Media on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.00) from holding Changjiang Publishing Media or give up 0.12% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Agricultural Bank of  vs.  Changjiang Publishing Media

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Agricultural Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Agricultural Bank of has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Agricultural Bank is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Changjiang Publishing 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Changjiang Publishing Media are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Changjiang Publishing is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing

The main advantage of trading using opposite Agricultural Bank and Changjiang Publishing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Agricultural Bank position performs unexpectedly, Changjiang Publishing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Changjiang Publishing will offset losses from the drop in Changjiang Publishing's long position.
The idea behind Agricultural Bank of and Changjiang Publishing Media pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk