Correlation Between Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Peoples Insurance of and Shenzhen Coship Electronics, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Peoples Insurance with a short position of Shenzhen Coship. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship.

Diversification Opportunities for Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship

0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Peoples and Shenzhen is 0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Peoples Insurance of and Shenzhen Coship Electronics in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Shenzhen Coship Elec and Peoples Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Peoples Insurance of are associated (or correlated) with Shenzhen Coship. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Shenzhen Coship Elec has no effect on the direction of Peoples Insurance i.e., Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Peoples Insurance is expected to generate 3.79 times less return on investment than Shenzhen Coship. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Peoples Insurance of is 1.94 times less risky than Shenzhen Coship. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Shenzhen Coship Electronics is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  204.00  in Shenzhen Coship Electronics on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  438.00  from holding Shenzhen Coship Electronics or generate 214.71% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.58%
ValuesDaily Returns

Peoples Insurance of  vs.  Shenzhen Coship Electronics

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Peoples Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Peoples Insurance of has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Peoples Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Shenzhen Coship Elec 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

32 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Shenzhen Coship Electronics are ranked lower than 32 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Shenzhen Coship sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship

The main advantage of trading using opposite Peoples Insurance and Shenzhen Coship positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Peoples Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Shenzhen Coship can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Shenzhen Coship will offset losses from the drop in Shenzhen Coship's long position.
The idea behind Peoples Insurance of and Shenzhen Coship Electronics pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio