Correlation Between Bank of Communications and China Reform

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of Communications and China Reform at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of Communications and China Reform into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of Communications and China Reform Health, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of Communications and China Reform and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of Communications with a short position of China Reform. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of Communications and China Reform.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of Communications and China Reform

-0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and China is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of Communications and China Reform Health in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Reform Health and Bank of Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of Communications are associated (or correlated) with China Reform. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Reform Health has no effect on the direction of Bank of Communications i.e., Bank of Communications and China Reform go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of Communications and China Reform

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of Communications is expected to generate 0.83 times more return on investment than China Reform. However, Bank of Communications is 1.21 times less risky than China Reform. It trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Reform Health is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  741.00  in Bank of Communications on November 7, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (16.00) from holding Bank of Communications or give up 2.16% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of Communications  vs.  China Reform Health

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bank of Communications has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Bank of Communications is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
China Reform Health 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days China Reform Health has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Bank of Communications and China Reform Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of Communications and China Reform

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of Communications and China Reform positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of Communications position performs unexpectedly, China Reform can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Reform will offset losses from the drop in China Reform's long position.
The idea behind Bank of Communications and China Reform Health pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges