Correlation Between Postal Savings and China Union

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Postal Savings and China Union at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Postal Savings and China Union into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Postal Savings Bank and China Union Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Postal Savings and China Union and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Postal Savings with a short position of China Union. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Postal Savings and China Union.

Diversification Opportunities for Postal Savings and China Union

-0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Postal and China is -0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Postal Savings Bank and China Union Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Union Holdings and Postal Savings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Postal Savings Bank are associated (or correlated) with China Union. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Union Holdings has no effect on the direction of Postal Savings i.e., Postal Savings and China Union go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Postal Savings and China Union

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Postal Savings Bank is expected to generate 0.9 times more return on investment than China Union. However, Postal Savings Bank is 1.11 times less risky than China Union. It trades about -0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Union Holdings is currently generating about -0.67 per unit of risk. If you would invest  550.00  in Postal Savings Bank on October 15, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (17.00) from holding Postal Savings Bank or give up 3.09% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Postal Savings Bank  vs.  China Union Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Postal Savings Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Postal Savings Bank has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Postal Savings is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
China Union Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days China Union Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, China Union is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Postal Savings and China Union Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Postal Savings and China Union

The main advantage of trading using opposite Postal Savings and China Union positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Postal Savings position performs unexpectedly, China Union can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Union will offset losses from the drop in China Union's long position.
The idea behind Postal Savings Bank and China Union Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities