Correlation Between China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Publishing Media and Zhejiang Publishing Media, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Publishing with a short position of Zhejiang Publishing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing.

Diversification Opportunities for China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing

0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Zhejiang is 0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Publishing Media and Zhejiang Publishing Media in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zhejiang Publishing Media and China Publishing is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Publishing Media are associated (or correlated) with Zhejiang Publishing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zhejiang Publishing Media has no effect on the direction of China Publishing i.e., China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon China Publishing Media is expected to generate 1.87 times more return on investment than Zhejiang Publishing. However, China Publishing is 1.87 times more volatile than Zhejiang Publishing Media. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Zhejiang Publishing Media is currently generating about -0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  706.00  in China Publishing Media on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  148.00  from holding China Publishing Media or generate 20.96% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

China Publishing Media  vs.  Zhejiang Publishing Media

 Performance 
       Timeline  
China Publishing Media 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Publishing Media are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, China Publishing sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Zhejiang Publishing Media 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zhejiang Publishing Media are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Zhejiang Publishing is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Publishing and Zhejiang Publishing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Publishing position performs unexpectedly, Zhejiang Publishing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zhejiang Publishing will offset losses from the drop in Zhejiang Publishing's long position.
The idea behind China Publishing Media and Zhejiang Publishing Media pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences