Correlation Between China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Publishing Media and Thinkingdom Media Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Publishing with a short position of Thinkingdom Media. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media.

Diversification Opportunities for China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media

0.22
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Thinkingdom is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Publishing Media and Thinkingdom Media Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Thinkingdom Media and China Publishing is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Publishing Media are associated (or correlated) with Thinkingdom Media. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Thinkingdom Media has no effect on the direction of China Publishing i.e., China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon China Publishing Media is expected to under-perform the Thinkingdom Media. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, China Publishing Media is 1.66 times less risky than Thinkingdom Media. The stock trades about -0.28 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Thinkingdom Media Group is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,891  in Thinkingdom Media Group on October 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  92.00  from holding Thinkingdom Media Group or generate 4.87% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

China Publishing Media  vs.  Thinkingdom Media Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
China Publishing Media 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Publishing Media are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, China Publishing is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Thinkingdom Media 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Thinkingdom Media Group are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Thinkingdom Media sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Publishing and Thinkingdom Media positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Publishing position performs unexpectedly, Thinkingdom Media can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Thinkingdom Media will offset losses from the drop in Thinkingdom Media's long position.
The idea behind China Publishing Media and Thinkingdom Media Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments