Correlation Between Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou and Cinda Securities Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Thinkon Semiconductor with a short position of Cinda Securities. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities.

Diversification Opportunities for Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities

0.81
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Thinkon and Cinda is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou and Cinda Securities Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cinda Securities and Thinkon Semiconductor is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou are associated (or correlated) with Cinda Securities. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cinda Securities has no effect on the direction of Thinkon Semiconductor i.e., Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou is expected to generate 1.4 times more return on investment than Cinda Securities. However, Thinkon Semiconductor is 1.4 times more volatile than Cinda Securities Co. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cinda Securities Co is currently generating about -0.23 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,140  in Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou on November 7, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  170.00  from holding Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou or generate 7.94% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou  vs.  Cinda Securities Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Thinkon Semiconductor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.
Cinda Securities 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Cinda Securities Co has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities

The main advantage of trading using opposite Thinkon Semiconductor and Cinda Securities positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Thinkon Semiconductor position performs unexpectedly, Cinda Securities can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cinda Securities will offset losses from the drop in Cinda Securities' long position.
The idea behind Thinkon Semiconductor Jinzhou and Cinda Securities Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance