Correlation Between Apple and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Apple and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Apple and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Apple Inc DRC and Procter Gamble DRC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Apple and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Apple with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Apple and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Apple and Procter Gamble

0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Apple and Procter is 0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Apple Inc DRC and Procter Gamble DRC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble DRC and Apple is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Apple Inc DRC are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble DRC has no effect on the direction of Apple i.e., Apple and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Apple and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Apple Inc DRC is expected to generate 1.17 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Apple is 1.17 times more volatile than Procter Gamble DRC. It trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble DRC is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,450,000  in Apple Inc DRC on November 2, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (35,000) from holding Apple Inc DRC or give up 2.41% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Apple Inc DRC  vs.  Procter Gamble DRC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Apple Inc DRC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Apple Inc DRC are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Apple may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in March 2025.
Procter Gamble DRC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble DRC are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong fundamental drivers, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Apple and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Apple and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Apple and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Apple position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind Apple Inc DRC and Procter Gamble DRC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments