Correlation Between Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Accel Entertainment with a short position of Playtika Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding

0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Accel and Playtika is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Playtika Holding Corp and Accel Entertainment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Accel Entertainment are associated (or correlated) with Playtika Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Playtika Holding Corp has no effect on the direction of Accel Entertainment i.e., Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Accel Entertainment is expected to generate 1.18 times more return on investment than Playtika Holding. However, Accel Entertainment is 1.18 times more volatile than Playtika Holding Corp. It trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Playtika Holding Corp is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,207  in Accel Entertainment on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (7.00) from holding Accel Entertainment or give up 0.58% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Accel Entertainment  vs.  Playtika Holding Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Accel Entertainment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Accel Entertainment are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent technical and fundamental indicators, Accel Entertainment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.
Playtika Holding Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Playtika Holding Corp are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite uncertain basic indicators, Playtika Holding may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Accel Entertainment position performs unexpectedly, Playtika Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Playtika Holding will offset losses from the drop in Playtika Holding's long position.
The idea behind Accel Entertainment and Playtika Holding Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance