Correlation Between Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ainsworth Game Technology and Collins Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ainsworth Game with a short position of Collins Foods. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods.

Diversification Opportunities for Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods

-0.61
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ainsworth and Collins is -0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ainsworth Game Technology and Collins Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Collins Foods and Ainsworth Game is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ainsworth Game Technology are associated (or correlated) with Collins Foods. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Collins Foods has no effect on the direction of Ainsworth Game i.e., Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ainsworth Game Technology is expected to under-perform the Collins Foods. In addition to that, Ainsworth Game is 3.71 times more volatile than Collins Foods. It trades about -0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Collins Foods is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  842.00  in Collins Foods on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  12.00  from holding Collins Foods or generate 1.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ainsworth Game Technology  vs.  Collins Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ainsworth Game Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ainsworth Game Technology has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
Collins Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Collins Foods are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Collins Foods unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ainsworth Game and Collins Foods positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ainsworth Game position performs unexpectedly, Collins Foods can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Collins Foods will offset losses from the drop in Collins Foods' long position.
The idea behind Ainsworth Game Technology and Collins Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance