Correlation Between Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aspen Insurance Holdings and WR Berkley, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aspen Insurance with a short position of WR Berkley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley.

Diversification Opportunities for Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley

0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Aspen and WRB-PH is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aspen Insurance Holdings and WR Berkley in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on WR Berkley and Aspen Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aspen Insurance Holdings are associated (or correlated) with WR Berkley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of WR Berkley has no effect on the direction of Aspen Insurance i.e., Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Aspen Insurance Holdings is expected to generate 1.69 times more return on investment than WR Berkley. However, Aspen Insurance is 1.69 times more volatile than WR Berkley. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. WR Berkley is currently generating about -0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,137  in Aspen Insurance Holdings on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  60.00  from holding Aspen Insurance Holdings or generate 2.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Aspen Insurance Holdings  vs.  WR Berkley

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Aspen Insurance Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aspen Insurance Holdings are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, Aspen Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
WR Berkley 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days WR Berkley has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fairly strong fundamental drivers, WR Berkley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aspen Insurance and WR Berkley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aspen Insurance position performs unexpectedly, WR Berkley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in WR Berkley will offset losses from the drop in WR Berkley's long position.
The idea behind Aspen Insurance Holdings and WR Berkley pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk