Correlation Between Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aspen Insurance Holdings and Global Indemnity PLC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aspen Insurance with a short position of Global Indemnity. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity.

Diversification Opportunities for Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity

0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Aspen and Global is 0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aspen Insurance Holdings and Global Indemnity PLC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global Indemnity PLC and Aspen Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aspen Insurance Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Global Indemnity. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global Indemnity PLC has no effect on the direction of Aspen Insurance i.e., Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Aspen Insurance is expected to generate 3.43 times less return on investment than Global Indemnity. In addition to that, Aspen Insurance is 1.52 times more volatile than Global Indemnity PLC. It trades about 0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Global Indemnity PLC is currently generating about 0.16 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,400  in Global Indemnity PLC on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  114.00  from holding Global Indemnity PLC or generate 3.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Aspen Insurance Holdings  vs.  Global Indemnity PLC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Aspen Insurance Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aspen Insurance Holdings are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, Aspen Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Global Indemnity PLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Global Indemnity PLC are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak essential indicators, Global Indemnity demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aspen Insurance and Global Indemnity positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aspen Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Global Indemnity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Indemnity will offset losses from the drop in Global Indemnity's long position.
The idea behind Aspen Insurance Holdings and Global Indemnity PLC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing