Correlation Between Montana Technologies and Caesarstone

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Montana Technologies and Caesarstone at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Montana Technologies and Caesarstone into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Montana Technologies and Caesarstone, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Montana Technologies and Caesarstone and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Montana Technologies with a short position of Caesarstone. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Montana Technologies and Caesarstone.

Diversification Opportunities for Montana Technologies and Caesarstone

-0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Montana and Caesarstone is -0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Montana Technologies and Caesarstone in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Caesarstone and Montana Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Montana Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Caesarstone. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Caesarstone has no effect on the direction of Montana Technologies i.e., Montana Technologies and Caesarstone go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Montana Technologies and Caesarstone

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Montana Technologies is expected to under-perform the Caesarstone. In addition to that, Montana Technologies is 1.86 times more volatile than Caesarstone. It trades about -0.06 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Caesarstone is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  400.00  in Caesarstone on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  22.00  from holding Caesarstone or generate 5.5% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy87.08%
ValuesDaily Returns

Montana Technologies  vs.  Caesarstone

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Montana Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Montana Technologies are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively conflicting basic indicators, Montana Technologies revealed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Caesarstone 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Caesarstone has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

Montana Technologies and Caesarstone Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Montana Technologies and Caesarstone

The main advantage of trading using opposite Montana Technologies and Caesarstone positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Montana Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Caesarstone can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Caesarstone will offset losses from the drop in Caesarstone's long position.
The idea behind Montana Technologies and Caesarstone pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments