Correlation Between Australia and Fisher Paykel

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Australia and Fisher Paykel at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Australia and Fisher Paykel into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Australia and New and Fisher Paykel Healthcare, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Australia and Fisher Paykel and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Australia with a short position of Fisher Paykel. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Australia and Fisher Paykel.

Diversification Opportunities for Australia and Fisher Paykel

0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Australia and Fisher is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Australia and New and Fisher Paykel Healthcare in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fisher Paykel Healthcare and Australia is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Australia and New are associated (or correlated) with Fisher Paykel. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fisher Paykel Healthcare has no effect on the direction of Australia i.e., Australia and Fisher Paykel go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Australia and Fisher Paykel

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Australia is expected to generate 1.55 times less return on investment than Fisher Paykel. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Australia and New is 1.68 times less risky than Fisher Paykel. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fisher Paykel Healthcare is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,217  in Fisher Paykel Healthcare on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,246  from holding Fisher Paykel Healthcare or generate 56.2% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Australia and New  vs.  Fisher Paykel Healthcare

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Australia and New 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Australia and New are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Australia is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Fisher Paykel Healthcare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fisher Paykel Healthcare are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical indicators, Fisher Paykel is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Australia and Fisher Paykel Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Australia and Fisher Paykel

The main advantage of trading using opposite Australia and Fisher Paykel positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Australia position performs unexpectedly, Fisher Paykel can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fisher Paykel will offset losses from the drop in Fisher Paykel's long position.
The idea behind Australia and New and Fisher Paykel Healthcare pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios