Correlation Between Apple and Apple
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Apple and Apple at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Apple and Apple into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Apple Inc and Apple Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Apple and Apple and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Apple with a short position of Apple. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Apple and Apple.
Diversification Opportunities for Apple and Apple
Almost no diversification
The 3 months correlation between Apple and Apple is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Apple Inc and Apple Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Apple Inc and Apple is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Apple Inc are associated (or correlated) with Apple. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Apple Inc has no effect on the direction of Apple i.e., Apple and Apple go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Apple and Apple
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Apple is expected to generate 1.02 times less return on investment than Apple. In addition to that, Apple is 1.0 times more volatile than Apple Inc. It trades about 0.07 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Apple Inc is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 13,979 in Apple Inc on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 7,961 from holding Apple Inc or generate 56.95% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Apple Inc vs. Apple Inc
Performance |
Timeline |
Apple Inc |
Apple Inc |
Apple and Apple Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Apple and Apple
The main advantage of trading using opposite Apple and Apple positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Apple position performs unexpectedly, Apple can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Apple will offset losses from the drop in Apple's long position.Apple vs. Penn National Gaming | Apple vs. Fast Retailing Co | Apple vs. Hochschild Mining plc | Apple vs. AUTO TRADER ADR |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.
Other Complementary Tools
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies |