Correlation Between World Energy and Morgan Stanley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both World Energy and Morgan Stanley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining World Energy and Morgan Stanley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between World Energy Fund and Morgan Stanley Institutional, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on World Energy and Morgan Stanley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in World Energy with a short position of Morgan Stanley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of World Energy and Morgan Stanley.

Diversification Opportunities for World Energy and Morgan Stanley

0.92
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between World and Morgan is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding World Energy Fund and Morgan Stanley Institutional in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Morgan Stanley Insti and World Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on World Energy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Morgan Stanley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Morgan Stanley Insti has no effect on the direction of World Energy i.e., World Energy and Morgan Stanley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between World Energy and Morgan Stanley

Assuming the 90 days horizon World Energy Fund is expected to generate 1.27 times more return on investment than Morgan Stanley. However, World Energy is 1.27 times more volatile than Morgan Stanley Institutional. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Morgan Stanley Institutional is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,407  in World Energy Fund on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  139.00  from holding World Energy Fund or generate 9.88% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

World Energy Fund  vs.  Morgan Stanley Institutional

 Performance 
       Timeline  
World Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in World Energy Fund are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, World Energy showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Morgan Stanley Insti 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Morgan Stanley Institutional are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Morgan Stanley may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

World Energy and Morgan Stanley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with World Energy and Morgan Stanley

The main advantage of trading using opposite World Energy and Morgan Stanley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if World Energy position performs unexpectedly, Morgan Stanley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Morgan Stanley will offset losses from the drop in Morgan Stanley's long position.
The idea behind World Energy Fund and Morgan Stanley Institutional pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance