Correlation Between World Energy and Stone Harbor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both World Energy and Stone Harbor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining World Energy and Stone Harbor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between World Energy Fund and Stone Harbor Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on World Energy and Stone Harbor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in World Energy with a short position of Stone Harbor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of World Energy and Stone Harbor.

Diversification Opportunities for World Energy and Stone Harbor

-0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between World and Stone is -0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding World Energy Fund and Stone Harbor Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Stone Harbor Emerging and World Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on World Energy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Stone Harbor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Stone Harbor Emerging has no effect on the direction of World Energy i.e., World Energy and Stone Harbor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between World Energy and Stone Harbor

Assuming the 90 days horizon World Energy Fund is expected to generate 2.79 times more return on investment than Stone Harbor. However, World Energy is 2.79 times more volatile than Stone Harbor Emerging. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Stone Harbor Emerging is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,291  in World Energy Fund on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  208.00  from holding World Energy Fund or generate 16.11% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

World Energy Fund  vs.  Stone Harbor Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
World Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in World Energy Fund are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, World Energy showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Stone Harbor Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Stone Harbor Emerging are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Stone Harbor is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

World Energy and Stone Harbor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with World Energy and Stone Harbor

The main advantage of trading using opposite World Energy and Stone Harbor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if World Energy position performs unexpectedly, Stone Harbor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Stone Harbor will offset losses from the drop in Stone Harbor's long position.
The idea behind World Energy Fund and Stone Harbor Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.

Other Complementary Tools

Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets