Correlation Between Autosports and Iron Road
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Autosports and Iron Road at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Autosports and Iron Road into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Autosports Group and Iron Road, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Autosports and Iron Road and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Autosports with a short position of Iron Road. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Autosports and Iron Road.
Diversification Opportunities for Autosports and Iron Road
0.82 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Autosports and Iron is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Autosports Group and Iron Road in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Iron Road and Autosports is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Autosports Group are associated (or correlated) with Iron Road. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Iron Road has no effect on the direction of Autosports i.e., Autosports and Iron Road go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Autosports and Iron Road
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Autosports Group is expected to generate 0.54 times more return on investment than Iron Road. However, Autosports Group is 1.84 times less risky than Iron Road. It trades about -0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Iron Road is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest 176.00 in Autosports Group on November 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (8.00) from holding Autosports Group or give up 4.55% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Strong |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Autosports Group vs. Iron Road
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Autosports Group |
| Iron Road |
Autosports and Iron Road Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Autosports and Iron Road
The main advantage of trading using opposite Autosports and Iron Road positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Autosports position performs unexpectedly, Iron Road can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Iron Road will offset losses from the drop in Iron Road's long position.| Autosports vs. My Foodie Box | Autosports vs. Iron Road | Autosports vs. Beston Global Food | Autosports vs. Pearl Gull Iron |
| Iron Road vs. Northern Star Resources | Iron Road vs. Evolution Mining | Iron Road vs. Bluescope Steel | Iron Road vs. Sandfire Resources NL |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.
Other Complementary Tools
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance |