Correlation Between Bank of America and Citigroup

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Citigroup at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Citigroup into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Citigroup, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Citigroup and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Citigroup. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Citigroup.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Citigroup

-0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Citigroup is -0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Citigroup in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Citigroup and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Citigroup. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Citigroup has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Citigroup go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Citigroup

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of America is expected to under-perform the Citigroup. But the preferred stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bank of America is 2.06 times less risky than Citigroup. The preferred stock trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Citigroup is currently generating about 0.29 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,122  in Citigroup on August 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  862.00  from holding Citigroup or generate 14.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Citigroup

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable fundamental indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and Citigroup Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Citigroup

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Citigroup positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Citigroup can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Citigroup will offset losses from the drop in Citigroup's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Citigroup pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.

Other Complementary Tools

AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio