Correlation Between Bank of America and Charles Schwab

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Charles Schwab at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Charles Schwab into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and The Charles Schwab, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Charles Schwab and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Charles Schwab. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Charles Schwab.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Charles Schwab

0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Charles is 0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and The Charles Schwab in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Charles Schwab and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Charles Schwab. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Charles Schwab has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Charles Schwab go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Charles Schwab

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.87 times less return on investment than Charles Schwab. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 1.07 times less risky than Charles Schwab. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Charles Schwab is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,956  in The Charles Schwab on November 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  34.00  from holding The Charles Schwab or generate 1.74% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  The Charles Schwab

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable fundamental indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Charles Schwab 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days The Charles Schwab has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with latest uncertain performance, the Preferred Stock's forward-looking indicators remain steady and the new chaos on Wall Street may also be a sign of medium-term gains for the company stakeholders.

Bank of America and Charles Schwab Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Charles Schwab

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Charles Schwab positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Charles Schwab can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Charles Schwab will offset losses from the drop in Charles Schwab's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and The Charles Schwab pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like