Correlation Between Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Mitsubishi UFJ. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ

-0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Mitsubishi is -0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mitsubishi UFJ Financial and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Mitsubishi UFJ. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of America is expected to under-perform the Mitsubishi UFJ. But the preferred stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bank of America is 2.19 times less risky than Mitsubishi UFJ. The preferred stock trades about -0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Mitsubishi UFJ Financial is currently generating about 0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  995.00  in Mitsubishi UFJ Financial on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  196.00  from holding Mitsubishi UFJ Financial or generate 19.7% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Mitsubishi UFJ Financial

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable fundamental indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mitsubishi UFJ Financial are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile technical and fundamental indicators, Mitsubishi UFJ may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Mitsubishi UFJ can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mitsubishi UFJ will offset losses from the drop in Mitsubishi UFJ's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals