Correlation Between Bank of America and Quaker Chemical

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Quaker Chemical at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Quaker Chemical into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Verizon Communications and Quaker Chemical, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Quaker Chemical and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Quaker Chemical. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Quaker Chemical.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Quaker Chemical

0.22
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Quaker is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Verizon Communications and Quaker Chemical in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Quaker Chemical and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Verizon Communications are associated (or correlated) with Quaker Chemical. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Quaker Chemical has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Quaker Chemical go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Quaker Chemical

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Verizon Communications is expected to generate 0.74 times more return on investment than Quaker Chemical. However, Verizon Communications is 1.35 times less risky than Quaker Chemical. It trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Quaker Chemical is currently generating about -0.29 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,981  in Verizon Communications on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (122.00) from holding Verizon Communications or give up 3.06% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Verizon Communications  vs.  Quaker Chemical

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Verizon Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Verizon Communications has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable fundamental indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Quaker Chemical 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Quaker Chemical has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Quaker Chemical is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Bank of America and Quaker Chemical Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Quaker Chemical

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Quaker Chemical positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Quaker Chemical can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Quaker Chemical will offset losses from the drop in Quaker Chemical's long position.
The idea behind Verizon Communications and Quaker Chemical pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities