Correlation Between Bank of America and Sterling Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Sterling Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Sterling Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Sterling Capital Total, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Sterling Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Sterling Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Sterling Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Sterling Capital

-0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Sterling is -0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Sterling Capital Total in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sterling Capital Total and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Sterling Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sterling Capital Total has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Sterling Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Sterling Capital

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to under-perform the Sterling Capital. In addition to that, Bank of America is 8.95 times more volatile than Sterling Capital Total. It trades about -0.17 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Sterling Capital Total is currently generating about -0.19 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  930.00  in Sterling Capital Total on January 14, 2025 and sell it today you would lose (15.00) from holding Sterling Capital Total or give up 1.61% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Sterling Capital Total

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in May 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Sterling Capital Total 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sterling Capital Total are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Sterling Capital is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Bank of America and Sterling Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Sterling Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Sterling Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Sterling Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sterling Capital will offset losses from the drop in Sterling Capital's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Sterling Capital Total pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities