Correlation Between Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Cascadia Acquisition. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition.
Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Bank and Cascadia is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cascadia Acquisition Corp and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Cascadia Acquisition. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cascadia Acquisition Corp has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition
If you would invest 3,244 in Bank of America on November 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,452 from holding Bank of America or generate 44.76% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Flat |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 0.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Bank of America vs. Cascadia Acquisition Corp
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Bank of America |
| Cascadia Acquisition Corp |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Very Weak
Weak | Strong |
Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition
The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Cascadia Acquisition positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Cascadia Acquisition can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cascadia Acquisition will offset losses from the drop in Cascadia Acquisition's long position.| Bank of America vs. Citigroup | Bank of America vs. Wells Fargo | Bank of America vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Bank of America vs. Royal Bank of |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.
Other Complementary Tools
| Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
| Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
| Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
| Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data |