Correlation Between Bank of America and Cross Country

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Cross Country at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Cross Country into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Cross Country Healthcare, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Cross Country and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Cross Country. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Cross Country.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Cross Country

-0.81
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Cross is -0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Cross Country Healthcare in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cross Country Healthcare and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Cross Country. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cross Country Healthcare has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Cross Country go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Cross Country

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 0.49 times more return on investment than Cross Country. However, Bank of America is 2.05 times less risky than Cross Country. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cross Country Healthcare is currently generating about -0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,806  in Bank of America on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,944  from holding Bank of America or generate 69.28% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Cross Country Healthcare

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Cross Country Healthcare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Cross Country Healthcare has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

Bank of America and Cross Country Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Cross Country

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Cross Country positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Cross Country can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cross Country will offset losses from the drop in Cross Country's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Cross Country Healthcare pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance