Correlation Between Bank of America and Cult Food

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Cult Food at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Cult Food into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Cult Food Science, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Cult Food and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Cult Food. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Cult Food.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Cult Food

-0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Cult is -0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Cult Food Science in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cult Food Science and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Cult Food. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cult Food Science has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Cult Food go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Cult Food

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.93 times less return on investment than Cult Food. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 6.9 times less risky than Cult Food. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cult Food Science is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5.03  in Cult Food Science on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.49) from holding Cult Food Science or give up 29.62% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Cult Food Science

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Cult Food Science 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Cult Food Science has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Bank of America and Cult Food Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Cult Food

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Cult Food positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Cult Food can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cult Food will offset losses from the drop in Cult Food's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Cult Food Science pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies