Correlation Between Bank of America and Mfs Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Mfs Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Mfs Emerging

-0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Mfs is -0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Mfs Emerging

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 3.28 times more return on investment than Mfs Emerging. However, Bank of America is 3.28 times more volatile than Mfs Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,278  in Bank of America on August 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,422  from holding Bank of America or generate 43.38% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Mfs Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mfs Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Bank of America and Mfs Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Mfs Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Mfs Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated