Correlation Between Bank of America and Greenland Minerals

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Greenland Minerals at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Greenland Minerals into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Greenland Minerals And, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Greenland Minerals and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Greenland Minerals. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Greenland Minerals.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Greenland Minerals

0.06
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Greenland is 0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Greenland Minerals And in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Greenland Minerals And and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Greenland Minerals. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Greenland Minerals And has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Greenland Minerals go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Greenland Minerals

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 4.45 times less return on investment than Greenland Minerals. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 13.85 times less risky than Greenland Minerals. It trades about 0.35 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Greenland Minerals And is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2.00  in Greenland Minerals And on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Greenland Minerals And or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Greenland Minerals And

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather fragile basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Greenland Minerals And 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Greenland Minerals And are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Greenland Minerals reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and Greenland Minerals Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Greenland Minerals

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Greenland Minerals positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Greenland Minerals can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Greenland Minerals will offset losses from the drop in Greenland Minerals' long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Greenland Minerals And pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges