Correlation Between Bank of America and Mfs Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Mfs Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Mfs Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Mfs Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Mfs Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Mfs Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Mfs Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Mfs Growth

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Mfs is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Mfs Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Growth Fund and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Growth Fund has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Mfs Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Mfs Growth

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.09 times less return on investment than Mfs Growth. In addition to that, Bank of America is 1.44 times more volatile than Mfs Growth Fund. It trades about 0.05 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Growth Fund is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  9,719  in Mfs Growth Fund on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5,203  from holding Mfs Growth Fund or generate 53.53% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Mfs Growth Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Mfs Growth Fund 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Growth Fund are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Mfs Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Bank of America and Mfs Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Mfs Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Mfs Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Growth will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Growth's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Mfs Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets