Correlation Between Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Mackenzie Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth

0.85
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Mackenzie is 0.85. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mackenzie Growth All and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Mackenzie Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mackenzie Growth All has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 3.37 times more return on investment than Mackenzie Growth. However, Bank of America is 3.37 times more volatile than Mackenzie Growth Allocation. It trades about 0.27 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mackenzie Growth Allocation is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,262  in Bank of America on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  513.00  from holding Bank of America or generate 12.04% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Mackenzie Growth Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Mackenzie Growth All 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mackenzie Growth Allocation are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, Mackenzie Growth may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Mackenzie Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mackenzie Growth will offset losses from the drop in Mackenzie Growth's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Mackenzie Growth Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges