Correlation Between Bank of America and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Maple Leaf Green, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Maple Leaf

-0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Maple is -0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Maple Leaf Green in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Green and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Green has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Maple Leaf

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 14.02 times less return on investment than Maple Leaf. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 11.77 times less risky than Maple Leaf. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Green is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4.20  in Maple Leaf Green on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.81) from holding Maple Leaf Green or give up 19.29% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Maple Leaf Green

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Maple Leaf Green 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Green are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Maple Leaf reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Maple Leaf Green pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum