Correlation Between Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Mawson Infrastructure. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure.
Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure
0.84 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Bank and Mawson is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mawson Infrastructure and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Mawson Infrastructure. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mawson Infrastructure has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 2.84 times less return on investment than Mawson Infrastructure. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 6.95 times less risky than Mawson Infrastructure. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mawson Infrastructure Group is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 270.00 in Mawson Infrastructure Group on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (56.00) from holding Mawson Infrastructure Group or give up 20.74% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Strong |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Bank of America vs. Mawson Infrastructure Group
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Bank of America |
| Mawson Infrastructure |
Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure
The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Mawson Infrastructure positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Mawson Infrastructure can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mawson Infrastructure will offset losses from the drop in Mawson Infrastructure's long position.| Bank of America vs. RLJ Lodging Trust | Bank of America vs. Aquagold International | Bank of America vs. Stepstone Group | Bank of America vs. Morningstar Unconstrained Allocation |
| Mawson Infrastructure vs. Terawulf | Mawson Infrastructure vs. Iris Energy | Mawson Infrastructure vs. Stronghold Digital Mining | Mawson Infrastructure vs. Argo Blockchain PLC |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
| Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
| Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
| Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
| Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies |