Correlation Between Bank of America and Pershing Resources

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Pershing Resources at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Pershing Resources into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Pershing Resources, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Pershing Resources and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Pershing Resources. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Pershing Resources.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Pershing Resources

-0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Pershing is -0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Pershing Resources in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Pershing Resources and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Pershing Resources. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Pershing Resources has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Pershing Resources go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Pershing Resources

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 9.63 times less return on investment than Pershing Resources. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 10.75 times less risky than Pershing Resources. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Pershing Resources is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.80  in Pershing Resources on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2.29) from holding Pershing Resources or give up 60.26% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Pershing Resources

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather fragile basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Pershing Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Pershing Resources has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable technical and fundamental indicators, Pershing Resources is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Bank of America and Pershing Resources Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Pershing Resources

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Pershing Resources positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Pershing Resources can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Pershing Resources will offset losses from the drop in Pershing Resources' long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Pershing Resources pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk