Correlation Between Bank of America and Red Moon

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Red Moon at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Red Moon into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Red Moon Resources, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Red Moon and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Red Moon. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Red Moon.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Red Moon

0.13
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Red is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Red Moon Resources in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Red Moon Resources and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Red Moon. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Red Moon Resources has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Red Moon go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Red Moon

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to under-perform the Red Moon. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bank of America is 3.54 times less risky than Red Moon. The stock trades about -0.37 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Red Moon Resources is currently generating about 0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  44.00  in Red Moon Resources on November 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Red Moon Resources or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Red Moon Resources

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unsteady performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.
Red Moon Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Red Moon Resources are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Red Moon is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Bank of America and Red Moon Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Red Moon

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Red Moon positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Red Moon can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Red Moon will offset losses from the drop in Red Moon's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Red Moon Resources pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments