Correlation Between Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of REDFLEX HOLDINGS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS

0.4
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and REDFLEX is 0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with REDFLEX HOLDINGS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to under-perform the REDFLEX HOLDINGS. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bank of America is 18.9 times less risky than REDFLEX HOLDINGS. The stock trades about -0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4.40  in REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD on November 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.97) from holding REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD or give up 22.05% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unsteady performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.
REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unfluctuating basic indicators, REDFLEX HOLDINGS reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, REDFLEX HOLDINGS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in REDFLEX HOLDINGS will offset losses from the drop in REDFLEX HOLDINGS's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon