Correlation Between Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Schwab Fundamental. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental

-0.22
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Schwab is -0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Schwab Fundamental and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Schwab Fundamental. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Schwab Fundamental has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.56 times more return on investment than Schwab Fundamental. However, Bank of America is 1.56 times more volatile than Schwab Fundamental Emerging. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Schwab Fundamental Emerging is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,901  in Bank of America on November 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  774.00  from holding Bank of America or generate 19.84% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Schwab Fundamental Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Schwab Fundamental 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Schwab Fundamental Emerging has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Schwab Fundamental is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Schwab Fundamental can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Schwab Fundamental will offset losses from the drop in Schwab Fundamental's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Schwab Fundamental Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world