Correlation Between Bank of America and Conservative Balanced

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Conservative Balanced at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Conservative Balanced into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Conservative Balanced Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Conservative Balanced and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Conservative Balanced. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Conservative Balanced.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Conservative Balanced

0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Conservative is 0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Conservative Balanced Allocati in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Conservative Balanced and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Conservative Balanced. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Conservative Balanced has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Conservative Balanced go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Conservative Balanced

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 4.45 times more return on investment than Conservative Balanced. However, Bank of America is 4.45 times more volatile than Conservative Balanced Allocation. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Conservative Balanced Allocation is currently generating about 0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,991  in Bank of America on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  784.00  from holding Bank of America or generate 19.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Conservative Balanced Allocati

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Conservative Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Conservative Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Conservative Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Bank of America and Conservative Balanced Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Conservative Balanced

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Conservative Balanced positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Conservative Balanced can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Conservative Balanced will offset losses from the drop in Conservative Balanced's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Conservative Balanced Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios