Correlation Between Bank of America and US Nuclear

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and US Nuclear at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and US Nuclear into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and US Nuclear Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and US Nuclear and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of US Nuclear. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and US Nuclear.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and US Nuclear

0.63
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and UCLE is 0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and US Nuclear Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on US Nuclear Corp and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with US Nuclear. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of US Nuclear Corp has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and US Nuclear go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and US Nuclear

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 42.07 times less return on investment than US Nuclear. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 43.81 times less risky than US Nuclear. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. US Nuclear Corp is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  8.50  in US Nuclear Corp on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (6.20) from holding US Nuclear Corp or give up 72.94% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  US Nuclear Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
US Nuclear Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in US Nuclear Corp are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating essential indicators, US Nuclear exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and US Nuclear Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and US Nuclear

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and US Nuclear positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, US Nuclear can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in US Nuclear will offset losses from the drop in US Nuclear's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and US Nuclear Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio